About CyberElite CMMC Service

Government Sector Cybersecurity Solutions

At CyberElite, we specialize in guiding organizations through the complexities of achieving Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC). As a Registered Provider Organization (RPO), we bring over 22 years of dedicated service in the government space, ensuring that our approach is not only compliant but also proven effective.

Why Choose CyberElite?

Deep Industry Experience

With more than two decades of experience working with government contractors, we understand the unique challenges and requirements of the government sector.

Preferred Partnerships

CyberElite is a preferred cybersecurity partner for some of the largest insurance companies in the United States. These partnerships enable us to offer specialized support to help their customer bases achieve necessary CMMC levels efficiently and effectively.

RPO Certified

Our RPO certification underscores our commitment to the highest standards of cybersecurity practices and our deep understanding of the CMMC framework.

Our Commitment to Excellence

We are committed to maintaining a leadership position among the top cybersecurity consulting firms in the federal government space. Our team of experts provides tailored solutions that not only meet but exceed the stringent requirements set forth by government contracts.

Leading by Example

In the dynamic field of government contracting, staying ahead means being prepared. CyberElite ensures that your organization is not only ready for today’s challenges but also equipped for future developments in cybersecurity regulations.

For more information on how we can assist your organization in becoming CMMC certified, please contact us.

Sales@cyberelitecorp.com

2024 Cybersecurity Trends

Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 – FAQ

CMMC is the Department of Defense’s framework to ensure contractors protect sensitive
data like Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information
(CUI).

Any organization in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) that stores, processes, or
transmits FCI or CUI—including universities, small businesses, and subcontractors.

  • Level 1 (Foundational): 17 basic cyber hygiene practices for FCI.
  • Level 2 (Advanced): 110 NIST SP 800-171 controls for CUI.
  • Level 3 (Expert): NIST SP 800-172 controls for critical CUI.

Significant changes to system architecture—hardware upgrades, OS changes, or new
data types—may require reassessment. Define “significant” internally and document it.

A Certified Third Party Assessment Organization authorized to conduct Level 2
assessments.

Yes, but they may need separate certification tied to their own CAGE code.

Failure to remediate POA&M items within 180 days may result in contract termination or ineligibility.

Any tool (e.g., backup systems, EDR, SIEM) that stores, processes, or transmits CUI.
Cloud tools must meet FedRAMP Moderate standards.

Yes. Devices accessing CUI must be encrypted, isolated, and protected from
unauthorized access.

Possibly. Even encrypted CUI may be considered in scope if within systems under your
control.

Generally no, but some agencies may introduce exceptions. Universities should review
contract language carefully.

Yes, if they still convey sensitive technical information.

Use crosscut shredders or other approved destruction methods. Outsourced shredding
must ensure immediate destruction.

Typically 6–12 months for Level 2. Larger organizations may take longer.

Assessment costs range from $30,000–$80,000. Total compliance costs may exceed
$300,000.

No, but you must be certified before award. Early certification is recommended.

Yes, if they store or process CUI. GCC High or GovCloud are preferred.

Only if they handle CUI. Otherwise, enterprise-grade tools are preferred.

Yes, but it’s difficult. Most foreign cloud providers lack FedRAMP authorization.

Not required, but strongly recommended to support future Level 2 advancement.

A senior executive with financial or legal responsibility.

No. All controls must be implemented to claim a 110 score.

“Implemented” means the control is actively in use and functioning. “Documented”
means there is written evidence (e.g., policies, procedures, logs) showing how the
control is applied and maintained.

Prime contractors must ensure their subcontractors meet the required CMMC level for
the data they handle. This may involve flow-down clauses, compliance attestations, or
requiring subcontractor assessments.

  • Incomplete documentation
  • Undefined system boundaries
  • Poor asset inventory
  • Lack of evidence for control implementation
  • Misinterpretation of CUI scope

Yes, but only if the shared infrastructure meets the security requirements for CUI.
Many organizations opt for a CUI enclave to simplify compliance and reduce risk.

  • Contract termination
  • False Claims Act violations
  • Suspension or debarment from future DoD contracts
  • Reputational damage

CMMC 2.0 simplifies the model to three levels, aligns more closely with NIST SP 800-171,
and allows self-assessments for some Level 1 and Level 2 contracts.

Currently, CMMC is specific to DoD contracts, but other agencies may adopt similar
frameworks in the future.

The Cyber AB (Accreditation Body) oversees the CMMC ecosystem, including training,
certifying assessors, and managing the C3PAO marketplace.

  • SSP and POA&M completeness
  • Control implementation evidence
  • Asset inventory and boundary definition
  • Internal audit results

The boundary includes all systems, users, and processes that store, process, or transmit
CUI. It must be clearly documented and justified.

Yes. Network segmentation and enclaves can isolate CUI systems, reducing the number of assets and controls in scope.

Organizations should use standardized CUI markings and maintain logs or systems to track CUI access, storage, and transmission.

  • Research data tied to DoD contracts
  • Technical drawings
  • Export-controlled information
  • Proprietary software or algorithms
  •  IT/security engineers
  • Compliance officers
  • Documentation specialists
  • External consultants or MSSPs

At least annually, or more frequently if major changes occur in systems or personnel.

GCC is suitable for general government use; GCC High meets stricter requirements for handling CUI and ITAR data.

Only if those services meet FedRAMP Moderate or High requirements and are properly
configured.

  • Access control
  • Incident response
  • Configuration management
  • Media protection
  • Personnel security
  • System and communications protection

Policies should be version-controlled, reviewed annually, and updated when systems,
regulations, or risks change.

Common Pitfalls in CMMC Certification

• Underestimating the Scope: Organizations often underestimate the extent of the processes and documentation required.

• Lack of Resources: Small to medium-sized enterprises may find the resource requirements for implementing necessary cybersecurity measures challenging.

• Insufficient Documentation: Failing to have thorough documentation is a common reason for failing CMMC assessments.

How CyberElite Can Help

CyberElite can assist organizations in becoming CMMC certified by:

• Gap Analysis: Identifying the current cybersecurity practices versus what is required at each CMMC level.

• Tailored Cybersecurity Solutions: Implementing necessary cybersecurity measures tailored to the organization’s specific needs.

• Documentation and Compliance Support: Helping with the creation and management of required documentation and compliance.

Interested in our Cyber Security Program? Schedule a consultation now!